Car Accident Attorney Seattle Dubin Law Group
Rear-end collisions are a common type auto accident. When a driver’s vehicle is struck from behind, the resulting accident is almost always the striking driver’s fault. This is true no matter what the reason for the first driver slows down or stops.
This holds true because basic traffic laws dictate that a driver needs to be able to come to a safe stop when a vehicle ahead stops or slows down. This traffic rule is also true for sudden stops. If the offending driver cannot come to a safe stop, it is likely that they are not driving in a safe manner and, most likely, not as safely as the driver in front of them.
In most rear-end collision insurance claims, vehicle damage reveals a lot about the accident. Particularly, resulting vehicle damage is able to demonstrate and possibly prove how the accident transpired. If one vehicle’s front end is damaged and a second vehicle’s rear end is damaged, there is usually no doubt about what type of accident occurred.
Then there are other more complicated and bigger damage claims resulting from rear-end collisions, two cars are pushed into each other when a third car hits the middle car, propelling it into the rear of the first car. In this case, the driver of the third car is the one with the liability and is at fault for the rear-end accident. The middle and first car drivers would file their claims against the third car driver’s liability insurance policy. The traffic and liability laws protect the middle car driver in such instances because it is clear the residual or secondary collision caused between the middle and the first car is actually the result of the primary impact between the third and second cars. When searching for a top shelf car accident attorney Seattle Dubin Law Group is the best choice.
Although unlikely, It is possible for the driver whose car is hit from behind to endure some fault in a rear-end accident. This could be true if the struck car driver’s negligence caused the accident in some fashion. One example would be if the struck car’s brake lights were not functional. Another example would be if the struck car blew a tire and stopped in the middle of a traffic lane, rather than moving to the shoulder of the road. In those instances, the struck car’s driver may have some contributing negligence in the collision that could reduce or eliminate any monetary recovery.
If you find yourself in need of a professional and effective car accident attorney Seattle Dubin Law Group should be at the top of the list.